I saw this on Slashdot.org and it just makes you think.
"Neuroscientist Champadi Raman Mukundan claims his Brain Electrical Oscillations Signature test is so accurate, it can tell whether a person committed or only witnessed an act. In June, an Indian judge agreed, using BEOS to find a woman guilty of killing her former fiancé. Scientific experts are calling the decision "ridiculous" and "unconscionable", protesting that Mukundan's work has not even been peer reviewed. How reliable should a test have to be, when eyewitnesses are notoriously fallible? Does a person have a right to privacy over their own memories, or should society's interest in holding criminals accountable come first?"
Google Suspends Chinese E-Commerce App Pinduoduo Over Malware
-
Google says it has suspended the app for the Chinese e-commerce giant
Pinduoduo after malware was found in versions of the app. The move comes
just weeks a...
5 days ago
No comments:
Post a Comment